Pretty interesting and more than a little amusing:
http://greensource.construction.com/news/2010/101022Class-Action_Suit.asp
Apparently, the issue is that LEED claims to provide “independent, third-party verification that a building project meets the highest building and performance measures” which isn’t actually done in practice. As it stands, LEED certification is based on unaudited projections and no has no actual performance over time measurement to confirm that projections correlate with reality.
It seems doubtful this will actually go to trial, but two things are very interesting about this case:
1. This will likely lead to some sort of quality assurance program for LEED submissions, which will make the system more robust. Hopefully it will also lead to monitoring of actual performance of LEED-certified buildings.
2. It apparently takes a lawsuit to get the USGBC to actually follow through (if they even elect to follow through) and provide what they promise in their advertising claims. Of course, they may just elect to drop the verification claim.
If you read the article, make sure you read the comments – a few are more interesting and informed than the article itself.